PetitionOnline.uk

Report a petition

SOS BRUTALISM ... SOS SWIMMING POOL OSTEND

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

Which passage is false? You can click several sentences in the petition text, and tell us for each what is true. This is optional.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

SOS BRUTALISM ... SOS SWIMMING POOL OSTEND

For a respectful, sustainable renovation and redevelopment of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend

Foto © Lieve Colruyt

We recommend that the essence of the building complex of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend, designed by the architects Paul Felix and Jan Tanghe (1969-1976),will be preserved, renovated and provided with a sustainable new function.

In January 2016 it was revealed that its function as a swimming pool will seize to exist in the future, we want to argue that the architectural experience in a different form continues to exist.

Please note that the building is a unique example of the "brutalist" architecture in Flanders in the 70s and part of the urban identity of Ostend. It is therefore also included in the Flemish Inventory for Architectural Heritage and is listed in Ostend plan Architectural Heritage as a building with high locus value.

We call for an adaptive reuse with a new function, that allows the architecture and the site as a whole to be fully appreciated. The building deserves a constructive future.

More information follow this link

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

SOS BRUTALISM ... SOS SWIMMING POOL OSTEND

For a respectful, sustainable renovation and redevelopment of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend

Foto © Lieve Colruyt

We recommend that the essence of the building complex of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend, designed by the architects Paul Felix and Jan Tanghe (1969-1976),will be preserved, renovated and provided with a sustainable new function.

In January 2016 it was revealed that its function as a swimming pool will seize to exist in the future, we want to argue that the architectural experience in a different form continues to exist.

Please note that the building is a unique example of the "brutalist" architecture in Flanders in the 70s and part of the urban identity of Ostend. It is therefore also included in the Flemish Inventory for Architectural Heritage and is listed in Ostend plan Architectural Heritage as a building with high locus value.

We call for an adaptive reuse with a new function, that allows the architecture and the site as a whole to be fully appreciated. The building deserves a constructive future.

More information follow this link

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

SOS BRUTALISM ... SOS SWIMMING POOL OSTEND

For a respectful, sustainable renovation and redevelopment of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend

Foto © Lieve Colruyt

We recommend that the essence of the building complex of the municipal swimming pool in Ostend, designed by the architects Paul Felix and Jan Tanghe (1969-1976),will be preserved, renovated and provided with a sustainable new function.

In January 2016 it was revealed that its function as a swimming pool will seize to exist in the future, we want to argue that the architectural experience in a different form continues to exist.

Please note that the building is a unique example of the "brutalist" architecture in Flanders in the 70s and part of the urban identity of Ostend. It is therefore also included in the Flemish Inventory for Architectural Heritage and is listed in Ostend plan Architectural Heritage as a building with high locus value.

We call for an adaptive reuse with a new function, that allows the architecture and the site as a whole to be fully appreciated. The building deserves a constructive future.

More information follow this link

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.