PetitionOnline.uk

Report a petition

Statement against austerity politics

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Statement against austerity politics

The Finnish government must cancel the proposed budget cuts or resign

The current government of Finland intends to make cuts of three billion euros in total in the education sector during its time in power. These cuts are targeted at early childhood education and kindergartens, elementary and vocational schools, universities and universities of applied sciences. The idea behind budget cuts targeting the education sector is to increase economic competitiveness, as opposed to seeing education as a driving factor in a better-educated, more equal society.

Budget cuts are political choices which can be replaced by other alternatives. Austerity is based on an economic theory in which people are assumed to primarily strive for their own benefit and to be independent of others. This kind of thinking dismisses the negative effects. Solutions that increase inequality aren’t seen as a problem. However, no one – not even the people that benefit from austerity – has reached their social status or wealth by themselves. The co-operation negotiations that are currently taking place in universities are a step towards a shift in the attitude towards educational equality. For example, since austerity politics were implemented in Britain, the country has seen an increase in suicide rates, poverty and homelessness. We do not want this kind of future!

Austerity widens the income gap and promotes inequality. The universities should not accept the demands for cuts. We, the undersigned, oppose the budget cuts that target the educational system and also austerity in a broader sense. We do not want a university where only people who are well off or wealthy can study. We do not want a university which demands tuition fees. We want a university where the education available is based on high quality research and is accessible to everyone, regardless of social status. We demand that universities be guided by educational and cultural policies, not by the demands of companies, product development and financial innovation.

Austerity politics are based on the Finnish government’s decisions, which go against the election promises that were given before the elections. We demand that the government either cancel the budget cuts or resign from office. We are ready for a general strike against austerity.

Signatories,

Elina Lahelma, professori, emerita, kasvatustieteet, Helsingin yliopisto; Yrjö Engenström, Aikuiskasvatustieteen professori, HY; Kristiina Brunila, professori, tenure track, AGORA for the Study of Social Justice and Equality in Education, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki; HIlle Janhonen-Abruquah, FT, yliopistonlehtori, Opettajankoulutuslaitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Saila Poulter, KT, yliopistonlehtori, Helsingin yliopisto; Hannu Simola, professori, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Päivi Palojoki, professori, Opettajankoulutuslaitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Anna-Leena Riitaoja, FT, tutkijatohtori, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Mari Viita-Aho, opiskelija, Helsingin yliopisto; Elina Vaahtera, tohtorikoulutettava, Helsingin yliopisto; Katarina Jungar, Lektor i socialt arbete, Svenska social och kommunalhögskolan, Helsingfors Universitet; Taina Riikonen, FT, taiteen tutkijatohtori, Helsingin yliopiston tutkijakollegium; Elina Oinas, professori, Helsingin yliopisto; Duygu Uygun Tunc, Doctoral student in Philosophy, University of Helsinki; Åsa Slotte, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA, gymnasielärare; Viveca Rabb, Filosofie doktor, Svenska, ÅA; Natan Elgabsi, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA; Ann-Helen Sund, doktorand i etnologi, ÅA; Carl Haikarainen, doktorand i värme- och strömningsteknik; Pasi Virtanen, docent, Teknisk kemi och reaktionsteknik, ÅA. Peik Ingman, doktoran i religionsvetenskap, ÅA; Jason Finch, FD, ÅA; Kim Berts, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA, gymnasielärare; Patrik Hagman, Docent, universitetslärare i systematisk teologi ÅA; Mari Lindman, Filosofie doktor; Tom Karlsson, Bibliotekarie, Åbo Akademis bibliotek; Aleksi Huhta, Jatko-opiskelija, yleinen historia, Turun yliopisto; Henrik Serup Christensen, Docent, akademiforskare; Samforsk, Åbo Akademi; Bodil Lindfors, FD, timlärare i psykologi, Åbo Akademi; Carina Saarela, Doktorand i psykologi, Åbo Akademi; Birgitta Wahlberg, PD, specialforskare, Åbo Akademi; Antony Fredriksson, FD, Åbo Akademi; Maria Lassén-Seger, FD Maria Lassén-Seger, Åbo Akademi; Mia Österlund, Docent, univesitetslärare, Åbo Akademi; Jukka J. Rintala, Opiskelija, Turun yliopisto; Peter Nynäs, Professor i religionsvetenskap, Åbo Akademi; Hanna Kuusela, yliopistonlehtori, Turun yliopisto; Kim Holmberg, Postdoc-forskare, Turun yliopisto; Salla Tuori, PD, Forskningsledare, Åbo Akademi; Stefan Ek, FD, Fakulteten för samhällsvetenskaper och ekonomi, Åbo Akademi; ledande informationsspecialist, Åbo Akademis bibliotek; Lars Hertzberg, Professor emeritus i filosofi, Åbo Akademi; Hugo Strandberg, Docent, universitetslärare i filosofi, Åbo Akademi; Birgit Schaffar-Kronqvist, Pedagogie doktor, universitetslärare, Åbo Akademi; Tero Järvinen, Assistant professor, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Junghyun Yoon, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Marko Lähteenmäki, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Raakel Plamper, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Olli Suominen, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Sonia Lempinen, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Heikki Kinnari, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Heikki Silvennoinen, Professor, sociology of education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Arto Jauhiainen, Professor of education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Risto Rinne, Professor, director, vice dean, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Joel Kivirauma, Professor of special education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Saara Särmä, tutkijatohtori, Tampereen yliopisto / johtaja, Feministinen ajatushautomo Hattu; Jani Haapakoski, tohtoriopiskelija, Oulun Yliopisto; Riikka Palkki, jatko-opiskelija, Oulun yliopisto; Antti Teittinen, tutkimuspäällikkö, dosentti, Kehitysvammaliitto; Maija Lanas, tutkijatohtori, Oulun yliopisto, Suomen Akatemia; Mervi Kaukko, yliopisto-opettaja (globaalikasvatus), Oulun yliopisto; Marina Repina-Poutiainen, lastensuojelun psykologi, Helsinki; Lasse Kemppainen, lehtori, Oulun yliopisto; Rosa Meriläinen, Kirjailija, Tampere; Eila Jeronen, Dr. Adjunct professor, University of Oulu, Docent (Comparable with Adjunct professor), University of Lapland, Docent (Comparable with Adjunct professor), University of Helsinki; Juha Suoranta, Professor, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere; Jörn Donner, professori, kirjailija, elokuvaohjaaja; Pauliina Hulkko, Teatterityön professori, CMT/University of Tampere; Marja-Liisa Trux, tutkija-opettaja, Vapaa yliopisto; Eero Turkka, musiikin maisteri, kansanmuusikko; Toni Ruuska, Väitöskirjatutkija, Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulu; Esa Kirkkopelto, Taiteellisen tutkimuksen professori, Taideyliopisto.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Statement against austerity politics

The Finnish government must cancel the proposed budget cuts or resign

The current government of Finland intends to make cuts of three billion euros in total in the education sector during its time in power. These cuts are targeted at early childhood education and kindergartens, elementary and vocational schools, universities and universities of applied sciences. The idea behind budget cuts targeting the education sector is to increase economic competitiveness, as opposed to seeing education as a driving factor in a better-educated, more equal society.

Budget cuts are political choices which can be replaced by other alternatives. Austerity is based on an economic theory in which people are assumed to primarily strive for their own benefit and to be independent of others. This kind of thinking dismisses the negative effects. Solutions that increase inequality aren’t seen as a problem. However, no one – not even the people that benefit from austerity – has reached their social status or wealth by themselves. The co-operation negotiations that are currently taking place in universities are a step towards a shift in the attitude towards educational equality. For example, since austerity politics were implemented in Britain, the country has seen an increase in suicide rates, poverty and homelessness. We do not want this kind of future!

Austerity widens the income gap and promotes inequality. The universities should not accept the demands for cuts. We, the undersigned, oppose the budget cuts that target the educational system and also austerity in a broader sense. We do not want a university where only people who are well off or wealthy can study. We do not want a university which demands tuition fees. We want a university where the education available is based on high quality research and is accessible to everyone, regardless of social status. We demand that universities be guided by educational and cultural policies, not by the demands of companies, product development and financial innovation.

Austerity politics are based on the Finnish government’s decisions, which go against the election promises that were given before the elections. We demand that the government either cancel the budget cuts or resign from office. We are ready for a general strike against austerity.

Signatories,

Elina Lahelma, professori, emerita, kasvatustieteet, Helsingin yliopisto; Yrjö Engenström, Aikuiskasvatustieteen professori, HY; Kristiina Brunila, professori, tenure track, AGORA for the Study of Social Justice and Equality in Education, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki; HIlle Janhonen-Abruquah, FT, yliopistonlehtori, Opettajankoulutuslaitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Saila Poulter, KT, yliopistonlehtori, Helsingin yliopisto; Hannu Simola, professori, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Päivi Palojoki, professori, Opettajankoulutuslaitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Anna-Leena Riitaoja, FT, tutkijatohtori, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Helsingin yliopisto; Mari Viita-Aho, opiskelija, Helsingin yliopisto; Elina Vaahtera, tohtorikoulutettava, Helsingin yliopisto; Katarina Jungar, Lektor i socialt arbete, Svenska social och kommunalhögskolan, Helsingfors Universitet; Taina Riikonen, FT, taiteen tutkijatohtori, Helsingin yliopiston tutkijakollegium; Elina Oinas, professori, Helsingin yliopisto; Duygu Uygun Tunc, Doctoral student in Philosophy, University of Helsinki; Åsa Slotte, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA, gymnasielärare; Viveca Rabb, Filosofie doktor, Svenska, ÅA; Natan Elgabsi, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA; Ann-Helen Sund, doktorand i etnologi, ÅA; Carl Haikarainen, doktorand i värme- och strömningsteknik; Pasi Virtanen, docent, Teknisk kemi och reaktionsteknik, ÅA. Peik Ingman, doktoran i religionsvetenskap, ÅA; Jason Finch, FD, ÅA; Kim Berts, doktorand i filosofi, ÅA, gymnasielärare; Patrik Hagman, Docent, universitetslärare i systematisk teologi ÅA; Mari Lindman, Filosofie doktor; Tom Karlsson, Bibliotekarie, Åbo Akademis bibliotek; Aleksi Huhta, Jatko-opiskelija, yleinen historia, Turun yliopisto; Henrik Serup Christensen, Docent, akademiforskare; Samforsk, Åbo Akademi; Bodil Lindfors, FD, timlärare i psykologi, Åbo Akademi; Carina Saarela, Doktorand i psykologi, Åbo Akademi; Birgitta Wahlberg, PD, specialforskare, Åbo Akademi; Antony Fredriksson, FD, Åbo Akademi; Maria Lassén-Seger, FD Maria Lassén-Seger, Åbo Akademi; Mia Österlund, Docent, univesitetslärare, Åbo Akademi; Jukka J. Rintala, Opiskelija, Turun yliopisto; Peter Nynäs, Professor i religionsvetenskap, Åbo Akademi; Hanna Kuusela, yliopistonlehtori, Turun yliopisto; Kim Holmberg, Postdoc-forskare, Turun yliopisto; Salla Tuori, PD, Forskningsledare, Åbo Akademi; Stefan Ek, FD, Fakulteten för samhällsvetenskaper och ekonomi, Åbo Akademi; ledande informationsspecialist, Åbo Akademis bibliotek; Lars Hertzberg, Professor emeritus i filosofi, Åbo Akademi; Hugo Strandberg, Docent, universitetslärare i filosofi, Åbo Akademi; Birgit Schaffar-Kronqvist, Pedagogie doktor, universitetslärare, Åbo Akademi; Tero Järvinen, Assistant professor, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Junghyun Yoon, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Marko Lähteenmäki, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Raakel Plamper, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Olli Suominen, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Sonia Lempinen, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Heikki Kinnari, Doctoral candidate, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Heikki Silvennoinen, Professor, sociology of education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Arto Jauhiainen, Professor of education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Risto Rinne, Professor, director, vice dean, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Joel Kivirauma, Professor of special education, Department of Education, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning and Education, University of Turku; Saara Särmä, tutkijatohtori, Tampereen yliopisto / johtaja, Feministinen ajatushautomo Hattu; Jani Haapakoski, tohtoriopiskelija, Oulun Yliopisto; Riikka Palkki, jatko-opiskelija, Oulun yliopisto; Antti Teittinen, tutkimuspäällikkö, dosentti, Kehitysvammaliitto; Maija Lanas, tutkijatohtori, Oulun yliopisto, Suomen Akatemia; Mervi Kaukko, yliopisto-opettaja (globaalikasvatus), Oulun yliopisto; Marina Repina-Poutiainen, lastensuojelun psykologi, Helsinki; Lasse Kemppainen, lehtori, Oulun yliopisto; Rosa Meriläinen, Kirjailija, Tampere; Eila Jeronen, Dr. Adjunct professor, University of Oulu, Docent (Comparable with Adjunct professor), University of Lapland, Docent (Comparable with Adjunct professor), University of Helsinki; Juha Suoranta, Professor, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere; Jörn Donner, professori, kirjailija, elokuvaohjaaja; Pauliina Hulkko, Teatterityön professori, CMT/University of Tampere; Marja-Liisa Trux, tutkija-opettaja, Vapaa yliopisto; Eero Turkka, musiikin maisteri, kansanmuusikko; Toni Ruuska, Väitöskirjatutkija, Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulu; Esa Kirkkopelto, Taiteellisen tutkimuksen professori, Taideyliopisto.

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.