PetitionOnline.uk

Report a petition

Save Our Moose

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Save Our Moose

Save Our Moose

For the past number of years there has been an active campaign to drastically reduce the number of moose in the province of Newfoundland & Labrador. This campaign would have moose management shift away from a scientific, logic based management strategy to an emotional, fear response management strategy. The number of moose-vehicle collisions has been used to grossly misrepresent moose populations throughout the province. These numbers are being presented and decisions are being made that could adversely affect the future viability of a long held cultural tradition of going out and hunting moose for food and sport. Non-resident hunting in the province provides between $30-40 million dollars annually for provincial coffers. If one includes both direct and indirect economic benefits of hunting, from residents, then the number (conservatively) could be double that mentioned above! Thus, with a dramatic reduction in moose population there would also be a reduction in the economic spinoffs from the harvesting of these animals and a large loss of employment for those involved in this type of work.

As mentioned above, over the last decade there has been an increase in the number of moose-vehicle collisions. However, we believe that there are a variety of reasons for this. These include, but not limited to, the following: 1) Loss of habitat; 2) Increase in average speed combined with weather and time of day; 3) Increase in the number of distractions for drivers.

With the status of a “have province”, there has been an increase in construction province wide. Areas that were once forested have been lost to an ever expanding urban development. This loss of habitat has caused large game animals, like moose, to compete for space. Many times moose are traveling newly constructed roads (like the outer ring road in St. John’s) as corridors to traverse from one segment of habitat to the other. This brings them into direct competition with humans. Unfortunately, often times leading to moose-vehicle collisions.

Likewise, with an increase in major thoroughfares, drivers have increased their speed on an unprecedented levels. A recent announcement by the RCMP, stated that they are seeing the average speed to be between 120-160 km/hour. This increase in speed leaves drivers with little reaction time, especially when conditions are not ideal. With an increase in speed, poor lighting or weather conditions and combined with a large game animal, there is little wonder why moose-vehicle collisions have both increased in number and severity.

Furthermore, in today’s modern technological era, drivers have an ever increasing number of distractions. Cell phones are the main culprit in this. Drivers are often distracted by phone calls and/or text messages. One expert stated that in a recent study, an average person traveling 100 km/hour and looking down for just six (6) seconds, travel the distance of one football field. Traveling that distance in such a short time, basically blind, has led to car accidents and more especially moose-vehicle collisions.

Finally, with an announcement by Minister French (former Minister of the Department of Environment & Conservation) in 2011, that the number of moose in the province is already on the decline, we the undersigned petition ask that this government to be mindful of the greater issues at hand and that the governing bodies consider the statistical analysis and research over and above the impassioned sentiment of the few. So that, we may maintain a healthy moose population long into the future.

Sponsor

Totally Outdoors NL www.totallyoutdoorsnl.com

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Save Our Moose

Save Our Moose

For the past number of years there has been an active campaign to drastically reduce the number of moose in the province of Newfoundland & Labrador. This campaign would have moose management shift away from a scientific, logic based management strategy to an emotional, fear response management strategy. The number of moose-vehicle collisions has been used to grossly misrepresent moose populations throughout the province. These numbers are being presented and decisions are being made that could adversely affect the future viability of a long held cultural tradition of going out and hunting moose for food and sport. Non-resident hunting in the province provides between $30-40 million dollars annually for provincial coffers. If one includes both direct and indirect economic benefits of hunting, from residents, then the number (conservatively) could be double that mentioned above! Thus, with a dramatic reduction in moose population there would also be a reduction in the economic spinoffs from the harvesting of these animals and a large loss of employment for those involved in this type of work.

As mentioned above, over the last decade there has been an increase in the number of moose-vehicle collisions. However, we believe that there are a variety of reasons for this. These include, but not limited to, the following: 1) Loss of habitat; 2) Increase in average speed combined with weather and time of day; 3) Increase in the number of distractions for drivers.

With the status of a “have province”, there has been an increase in construction province wide. Areas that were once forested have been lost to an ever expanding urban development. This loss of habitat has caused large game animals, like moose, to compete for space. Many times moose are traveling newly constructed roads (like the outer ring road in St. John’s) as corridors to traverse from one segment of habitat to the other. This brings them into direct competition with humans. Unfortunately, often times leading to moose-vehicle collisions.

Likewise, with an increase in major thoroughfares, drivers have increased their speed on an unprecedented levels. A recent announcement by the RCMP, stated that they are seeing the average speed to be between 120-160 km/hour. This increase in speed leaves drivers with little reaction time, especially when conditions are not ideal. With an increase in speed, poor lighting or weather conditions and combined with a large game animal, there is little wonder why moose-vehicle collisions have both increased in number and severity.

Furthermore, in today’s modern technological era, drivers have an ever increasing number of distractions. Cell phones are the main culprit in this. Drivers are often distracted by phone calls and/or text messages. One expert stated that in a recent study, an average person traveling 100 km/hour and looking down for just six (6) seconds, travel the distance of one football field. Traveling that distance in such a short time, basically blind, has led to car accidents and more especially moose-vehicle collisions.

Finally, with an announcement by Minister French (former Minister of the Department of Environment & Conservation) in 2011, that the number of moose in the province is already on the decline, we the undersigned petition ask that this government to be mindful of the greater issues at hand and that the governing bodies consider the statistical analysis and research over and above the impassioned sentiment of the few. So that, we may maintain a healthy moose population long into the future.

Sponsor

Totally Outdoors NL www.totallyoutdoorsnl.com

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.