PetitionOnline.uk

Report a petition

Support for the alternative bus route Havelock North - West

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

Which passage is false? You can click several sentences in the petition text, and tell us for each what is true. This is optional.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Support for the alternative bus route Havelock North - West

On the 19th of January a stand-up meeting was held outside #9 Upham Street concerning the council’s choice to use Upham Street as an increasingly frequent dual direction bus route. Residents’ are concerned about the narrow nature of the street, the school access alleyway danger, the damage to residents parked vehicles due to the bus, the speed at which the bus transitions the road, some bus drivers presumption of their ‘right of way’ rather than following the road-code, the already high frequency of service vehicles, the questionable choice to turn right onto Middle Road and also back onto Te Aute Road during peak traffic times which will cause additional traffic congestion in addition to the decision to chicane back onto Upham Street across Middle Road from Palmerston Road during those times.

Last night it was revealed that the public consultation, which we were told occurred several years ago, had had limited advertisement on the radio and posters on the buses only. Therefore, most of us affected were unaware of the changes the council intended to make until few select homes were provided with letters informing us in December 2025. An implied, dismal – you ignored the initial opportunity to feedback response from the council was received by some of the residents in response to their correspondence of concern in December 2025 at the impending changes to the bus service occurring this month, January 2026. Furthermore, it was also revealed that the area most requiring bus services has been left off the new route altogether. A survey of bus users revealed that Lipscombe Cresent had the highest number of passengers, yet the bus is no longer going to traverse this area in the changed route.

We have suggested an alternative route to the council, see map above, which seeks to mitigate the issues discussed, and to create better traffic flow especially during peak travel times. The suggestion removes Upham Street as a pathway to Middle Road for a frequent, dual direction bus service given its congested and narrow nature. Where possible the bus will utilise left hand turns and only turn right crossing one lane to reduce traffic flow impairment.

I hope that others can support the alternative suggestion before the changes are embedded and more rate-payer funding is spent on new bus stops, signage and advertising etc and in order to ensure a safer, more efficient and effective bus service for Havelock North west.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Support for the alternative bus route Havelock North - West

On the 19th of January a stand-up meeting was held outside #9 Upham Street concerning the council’s choice to use Upham Street as an increasingly frequent dual direction bus route. Residents’ are concerned about the narrow nature of the street, the school access alleyway danger, the damage to residents parked vehicles due to the bus, the speed at which the bus transitions the road, some bus drivers presumption of their ‘right of way’ rather than following the road-code, the already high frequency of service vehicles, the questionable choice to turn right onto Middle Road and also back onto Te Aute Road during peak traffic times which will cause additional traffic congestion in addition to the decision to chicane back onto Upham Street across Middle Road from Palmerston Road during those times.

Last night it was revealed that the public consultation, which we were told occurred several years ago, had had limited advertisement on the radio and posters on the buses only. Therefore, most of us affected were unaware of the changes the council intended to make until few select homes were provided with letters informing us in December 2025. An implied, dismal – you ignored the initial opportunity to feedback response from the council was received by some of the residents in response to their correspondence of concern in December 2025 at the impending changes to the bus service occurring this month, January 2026. Furthermore, it was also revealed that the area most requiring bus services has been left off the new route altogether. A survey of bus users revealed that Lipscombe Cresent had the highest number of passengers, yet the bus is no longer going to traverse this area in the changed route.

We have suggested an alternative route to the council, see map above, which seeks to mitigate the issues discussed, and to create better traffic flow especially during peak travel times. The suggestion removes Upham Street as a pathway to Middle Road for a frequent, dual direction bus service given its congested and narrow nature. Where possible the bus will utilise left hand turns and only turn right crossing one lane to reduce traffic flow impairment.

I hope that others can support the alternative suggestion before the changes are embedded and more rate-payer funding is spent on new bus stops, signage and advertising etc and in order to ensure a safer, more efficient and effective bus service for Havelock North west.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Support for the alternative bus route Havelock North - West

On the 19th of January a stand-up meeting was held outside #9 Upham Street concerning the council’s choice to use Upham Street as an increasingly frequent dual direction bus route. Residents’ are concerned about the narrow nature of the street, the school access alleyway danger, the damage to residents parked vehicles due to the bus, the speed at which the bus transitions the road, some bus drivers presumption of their ‘right of way’ rather than following the road-code, the already high frequency of service vehicles, the questionable choice to turn right onto Middle Road and also back onto Te Aute Road during peak traffic times which will cause additional traffic congestion in addition to the decision to chicane back onto Upham Street across Middle Road from Palmerston Road during those times.

Last night it was revealed that the public consultation, which we were told occurred several years ago, had had limited advertisement on the radio and posters on the buses only. Therefore, most of us affected were unaware of the changes the council intended to make until few select homes were provided with letters informing us in December 2025. An implied, dismal – you ignored the initial opportunity to feedback response from the council was received by some of the residents in response to their correspondence of concern in December 2025 at the impending changes to the bus service occurring this month, January 2026. Furthermore, it was also revealed that the area most requiring bus services has been left off the new route altogether. A survey of bus users revealed that Lipscombe Cresent had the highest number of passengers, yet the bus is no longer going to traverse this area in the changed route.

We have suggested an alternative route to the council, see map above, which seeks to mitigate the issues discussed, and to create better traffic flow especially during peak travel times. The suggestion removes Upham Street as a pathway to Middle Road for a frequent, dual direction bus service given its congested and narrow nature. Where possible the bus will utilise left hand turns and only turn right crossing one lane to reduce traffic flow impairment.

I hope that others can support the alternative suggestion before the changes are embedded and more rate-payer funding is spent on new bus stops, signage and advertising etc and in order to ensure a safer, more efficient and effective bus service for Havelock North west.

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.




Paid advertising

PetitionOnline.uk will advertise this petition to 6,000 people.

Learn more...

Choose your budget
Payment method
PayPalGoogle PayApple PayCredit Card

Choose a payment method to continue.