No to Hartwells Student Build
 Contact the author of the petition
 Contact the author of the petition
This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition No to Hartwells Student Build.
| modernmilly | #12014-05-09 16:38This land is obviously going to be developed but Bath desperately needs more housing for young buyers rather than more student accommodation | 
|  | |
| MikeCB | #2 Too big and in the wrong place2014-05-10 06:28Students are a very positive part of life in Bath, but this development is just far too big and in the wrong place.  A residential development done in partnership with the surrounding community does seem like a better option for this site.  Also I would love to see a linear park with pedestrian and cycle paths. | 
|  | |
| @Al_prof | #32014-05-10 12:04I agree with both comments. I am a University Professor and definitely pro-student. But I know from other Uni developments all around the country that town vs gown friction always results when high density student housing is (especially from the "for profit" sector of housing owners) is plonked in the middle of a residential district. I am also angered at the lack of consultation. When you look at the plans you can see from the surrounding property that the pictures are based on drawings from two years ago. So why have they only consulted now in the same month they plan to put the planning application in? | 
|  | |
| Achilles | #4 Hartwell's Student Build2014-05-10 12:56I also believe that new build should be for the residents of Bath. The young people of the city need good, affordable housing but this proposal is aimed at a transient population who will have no real stake in the community. Both Universities have plenty of their own land that they could use for new student accommodation. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #52014-05-10 13:26This development is just too large for the area which has relatively limited local amenities. Far better for the site to be used for a private residential development. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #62014-05-10 16:24We already have problems with RUH staff parking in Newbridge Road plus parents parking in order to deliver their children to the local school.  Children also cross the road outside Hartwells, quite often running ahead of their parents - an accident waiting to happen!  | 
|  | |
| Guest | #72014-05-10 18:02The lack of a full and proper consultation period is deplorable.  This appears to be a very high density student accommodation with a poor bedroom to parking ratio in a residential area.  This site should be used to develop more affordable housing within Bath. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #82014-05-10 18:30This is a ridiculous spot for housing 500 students.  | 
|  | |
| Guest | #92014-05-11 07:27I think it is important for residents and for parents of children at Newbridge School to be consulted fully on this. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #102014-05-11 18:48It is an ill thought out scheme for such a residential area. Local residents already have difficulty parking because of parents and teachers going to Newbridge Primary School and also nurses and patients going to the Royal United Hospital. Some Very often parking ALL DAY. There will be noise and vandalism from "some students" during the night and early morning when returning from nightclubs. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #112014-05-11 19:01This proposal has not been very well thought out for such a residential area and should be scrapped.  | 
|  | |
| Guest | #122014-05-11 19:28To propose  a site for 400+ students in the middle of a residential area miles away from uni facilities and the type of amenities students require (supermarket/night clubs/library?) is unsuitable for all concerned. Aside from the issues already mentioned (parking/volume of beds), if this scheme were successful it would no doubt over time lead to the degredation of the area through a general increase in student population via private lettings as has happened in large parts of Oldfield Park. Residential or possibly mixed commercial/residential is a far more appropriate use. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #132014-05-11 20:06The proposed plan would be disastrous for the area. This area is already congested with parking from the hospital and the school. The proposed plan does not provide sufficient parking for the students, and it is ludicrous to suggest that students will not bring cars with them, when the site is located so far from the university or from any of the amenities that they would need.  Furthermore, the houses in the area would begin to convert to student lets, the parking pressure would be increased again and the area would begin to lose value and desirability. | 
|  | |
| tim | #14 a good scheme2014-05-11 20:19When you think of the alternatives, a supermarket, houses etc, then I actuallyvthink that the student build is pretty good.  They are thebonly category of tennants where yih can enforce a no car rules, they would help support the shops on Chelsea Road and, unlike houses for sale they would not put any furthervpressure on places at Newbridge School.  The slopjng site is ideally suited to multistory buildings which would allow high density and yet not obscure anyones views. Face it, this land will get build on sooner or later, if this scheme falls the alternatives could be a lit worse. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #15 Re: a good scheme2014-05-11 20:35400-500 students in a residential district or 50 affordable houses (with a parking space each) for the next generation of permanent residents? You choose! Also, if this is a private "for profit" student accommodation, how can anyone legally enforce no cars? (its not like its on campus). WASPS (another good school in the district) is going to 3 form entry, so not sure argument about school places is that crucial. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #162014-05-11 20:35To propose  a site for 400+ students in the middle of a residential area miles away from uni facilities and the type of amenities students require (supermarket/night clubs/library?) is unsuitable for all concerned. Aside from the issues already mentioned (parking/volume of beds), if this scheme were successful it would no doubt over time lead to the degredation of the area through a general increase in student population via private lettings as has happened in large parts of Oldfield Park. Residential or possibly mixed commercial/residential is a far more appropriate use. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #172014-05-12 08:02With the need for more residential housing in Bath and the preference for using brown field  sites rather than green field makes this site a prime candidate for new low cost housing for Bath's younger generations. The proposal to build accommodation for 500 students on this site is ridiculous with it being far too large and in the wrong place. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #182014-05-12 15:45I think the location of this site so close to our school will actually make it even more like running the gauntlet for the kids going to and from. I don't think the area could effectively cope with such a large development. Far more suited to residential development.  | 
|  | |
| Guest | #192014-05-12 15:53Parking and traffic congestion problems will have a huge effect on travelling to and from Bath | 
|  | |
| Guest | #202014-05-13 07:43A quiet residential street cannot absorb 450 students. There are no amenities - how would this many people gain access to the services they need? A student campus like this should be on University grounds, not in a residential area.  | 
|  | |
| Guest | #212014-05-13 07:56No thought has been given to the residents currently living in the area and the impact this will have on them.  The noise level will be very high when you have such a high number of students in one small area and the bus infrastructure does not allow for a high volume of students catching the bus!  | 
|  | |
| Pam | #22 Too Many Students For The Proposed Site2014-05-13 08:28As per the other comments - too many people in such a small area would not work in many ways. What we need is more affordable houses to keep the community feel of the area. | 
|  | |
| Choose a nickname | #23 Subject2014-05-13 11:40"WASPS (another good school in the district) is going to 3 form entry, so not sure argument about school places is that crucial." Actually, WASPs have been 3 form entry for some time. There is immense pressure on primary school places in the north west of the city already. Add this to the plan to build on Primrose Hill, and effectively, you are narrowing the school catchment to the families that can afford to live in the fairly expensive properties within close proximity to the two schools. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #242014-05-13 12:10The proposed development is too large for the space available. 85 car-parking spaces for 431 bedrooms is ludicrous and will lead to huge traffic and parking problems. A small residential development with self contained parking facilities is appropriate. | 
|  | |
| Guest | #252014-05-13 15:24The Newbridge area in Bath has a mixed community of young families, young professionals as well as a middle aged and elderly population. Chelsea Rd shops are ideal for this mix of families but will be drastically changed by the needs of large numbers of students.  Parking is already difficult with 2 schools and RUH using the side roads. The number if people queuing for buses will potentially be dangerous on narrow pavements | 
|  | |
| 
 | 
Is there something you want to change?
Change doesn't happen by staying silent. The author of this petition stood up and took action. Will you do the same? Start a social movement by creating a petition.
Start a petition of your ownOther petitions you might be interested in
SALFORD RED DEVILS FANS AGAINST JACOBSEN VENTURE GROUP
1144 Created: 2025-10-29
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 1144 | 
| 30 days | 1144 | 
Save The Dog Inn, Whalley’s character and ambience
471 Created: 2025-10-26
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 471 | 
| 30 days | 471 | 
Petition Against the Closure of Hollowgate - November 2025
330 Created: 2025-10-18
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 330 | 
| 30 days | 330 | 
Rink Hockey to be considered for the Olympic Games
1206 Created: 2023-09-12
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 1206 | 
| 30 days | 53 | 
Tony Wright for Clash of the Comics 2025
33 Created: 2025-10-01
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 33 | 
| 30 days | 33 | 
Save the puffins!
20 Created: 2025-10-12
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 20 | 
| 30 days | 20 | 
For the maximum effective sentence for Gabriela Sashova and Krasimir Georgiev, and for legislative changes envisaging harsher penalties for crimes committed against animals!
204992 Created: 2025-03-14
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 204992 | 
| 30 days | 674 | 
Petition to restrict speed at Bagginswood
43 Created: 2025-09-20
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 43 | 
| 30 days | 16 | 
Let’s save Galleria Forum Box – Secure the future of art in Helsinki at least until 2030!
2192 Created: 2025-10-17
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 2192 | 
| 30 days | 2192 | 
MAYOR SADIQ KHAN CRIME PETITION
219 Created: 2023-10-06
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 219 | 
| 30 days | 6 | 
The return of Hajime no ippo season 4
45 Created: 2025-10-28
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 45 | 
| 30 days | 45 | 
Support app i-Smart MG EHS phev in Europe
70 Created: 2021-12-07
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 70 | 
| 30 days | 3 | 
Medirest Staff Barnet Hospital entitled for the Nhs Agenda for Change and pay increase
180 Created: 2025-06-20
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 180 | 
| 30 days | 3 | 
Dangerous Rapist Out of St Katherine Court, Newburgh, Fife.
30 Created: 2025-04-30
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 30 | 
| 30 days | 2 | 
Save Dinu Lipatti's House!
2026 Created: 2025-03-20
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 2026 | 
| 30 days | 10 | 
Return to the UK's Christian Constitution
571 Created: 2024-08-14
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 571 | 
| 30 days | 2 | 
Zeekee's Law
836 Created: 2024-03-16
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 836 | 
| 30 days | 6 | 
Stop using EVRI
223 Created: 2022-11-25
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 223 | 
| 30 days | 2 | 
I oppose the Digital ID / Auschwitz ID and all those who support it
78 Created: 2022-11-23
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 78 | 
| 30 days | 4 | 
Boycott Israel in Eurovision 2026!
6548 Created: 2025-09-22
| Time period | Number of signatures | 
|---|---|
| All time | 6548 | 
| 30 days | 2369 |