ULEZ FINES | Bishop of London Rt Hon Dame Sarah Mullally to her legal duty of enforcing the Confirmation of the Charters Act 1297 on Justices' & Mayor | ALL the Ancient Liberties of London Magna Carta
Contact the author of the petition
Specimen of the Certificates of the Citizens of London that Granted them Liberties (including freedom from all Tolls around the Country (not just Kings Peace routes)
2025-02-04 04:48:53
Richard Kelly
More Websites now appearing with Evidence
2025-02-04 04:45:52A 2015 website has appeared. When a few months ago, google waa showing literally hardly nothing, about the "Kings Peace" and four great roads.
Here, it is Henry Of Huntingdon who is attributed to writings in the 12th century around the basis in the Edward Confessor laws, of the Kings Peace.
As these roads go through London, it must be connected to the London Liberties of Toll free (not just for Londoners) who would be toll free anyway on the Kings Peace as anyone. But their privilege extended to all roads. Not just the Kings routes. Because Travellers from Ireland had free passage on the Watling Street.
There is also now a direct connection Between Henry of Huntingdon touching upon the subject and Oliver Cromwell being from Huntingdon..and after the restoration of the Crown.....and anger at Cromwell (his head being placed on the roof of Westminster Hall for 30 years) 3 years after the restoration and during the revenge ceremonies... A Toll was placed on the Great North Road. Near Cromwells homelands. Against the law of the Kings Peace routes. (Cromwell, his body was dug up against Wealreaf law also) this was before the later tolls became introduced through late 1600s to 1700s where many were placed around London. But not within the City.
The M6 Toll which is also in the Kings Peace route, was being constructed while the 2002 congestion charge was introduced. Both further violations of constitutional law of the ancient liberties.
Richard Kelly
So, Transport for London has NOT listed the Exemption for City of London Residents in the new Website list
2025-02-03 02:25:37
Richard Kelly
Woolwich Ferry has always been free
2025-02-02 23:23:10Ive touched upon this before, but not these details..
Ok, so i had not realsed the part about the Woolwich ferry always being free! Ive never used it! Though i have been across the Bridges in London and used the Blackwall Tunnel free also.
https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-dulwich-tollbooth.html?m=1
The Dulwich was founded by Edward Alleyn a particularly successful Elizabethan actor. He used his career earnings to buy the manor of Dulwich - a substantial plot then well outside London - and also set about establishing a school which he called the College of God's Gift. With no heirs to pass the land on to, in 1619 he set up a charitable bequest which in modified form holds sway over the estate today.
The Dulwich Eatate still owns the freehold to 2.5 squiare miles of southeast London strung out between Denmark Hill and Crystal Palace. It's mostly green, embracing significant parkland, woods, an 18-hole golf course and a large number of sports grounds.
Pass through at this time of year and you'll likely spot lads with bulging bags of cricket kit on their backs with bat and pads protruding. Edward Alleyn's school is now much better known as Dulwich College and independently thriving.
The toll road dates back to 1789 and was built by John Morgan who went by the unlikely title of Lord of the Manor of Penge. 😅 He lived at the top of Sydenham Hill and wanted an access road north across college fields, so they let him, but when the lease expired.
So it seems that this Toll is nothing really to do with the Liberty of London, as beyond it. And it is no toll or tax of existing major routes into London. It was just a result of creating a new road through private land, to make some money. 😏 Likely we can strike off a number of the other tolls from the map, on a similar basis. But i think that Magna Carta would have given Londoners free privilege of passage through this toll, and still should. 🤨
Richard Kelly
Milestones
2025-02-02 21:55:51The Book on London Liberties and certain acts that touch on Turnpikes, states that no milestone for London could be placed closer than 3 miles from the Location of the Central Post office building.
I thought this was a significant distance when looking at the definition of The City of London. And how far the Old Tolls were from the city centre.
I have measured Dulwich and it is about 5 miles from the centre. Therefore a lot further out than the minimum.distance of the Milestones. So an extra two miles away.
We have the map remember that i added earlier in these updates, which shows all of the old Tolls, which actually were avoidable anyway if someone went a different way in.
I think this is worth mentioning when we get onto the subject of.... What can we legally argue what London IS now?? Would Magna Carta define much more than the Old City Walls? What is the full extent in the latest charter? Can it override Magna Carta? If no size is given ir made in the Edward Confessor laws ? Only its Name. London.
Red circles are the Ancient Tolls.
White central circle is the Post Office building in London.
The inner circle is the 3 mile radius of no milestones. The outer circle is 5 mile radius which mist of the tolls are within. And the cream area in the centre is the Original Liberty of London. But there are no tolls in the wider Liberty Cap shape area unmarked) which is the more modern city boundary.
Dulwich is one of the most furthest away from the centre, though. And the others do look within the 3 miles. I will update this image with the measurements. But there IS a case to make that these were also illegal, like the Toll on the great North Road. Erimine Street, Kings Peace.
Richard Kelly
Update Submit to 5 councils
2025-02-02 21:09:34Sunday 2nd February, i submitted representations to all five councils Harrow, Bromley, Surrey, Hillingdon, Bexley. And listed alll the real true legal arguments that must be made.. around the Magna Carta Ancient Liberties.
The basis for isolated spot fines, which were offences, and nothing close to being defined as what the current charges are being used to be founded on... Cannot be used as a way to get around and give excuse to defy the constitutional law and principle to the same effect of road tolls and charges general to blanket road users. And end up with outrageous charges on mass. And which are against the point of the liberty itself.
Therefore all the real legal points need to be made.
As they never have been truly argued since 2002. Implementation. Also, a little prehistory.
Richard Kelly
MESSAGE TO THE 5 COUNCILS
2025-02-02 19:41:47
So, the High Court case that was lost Against the Mayor of London can be appealed to the Supreme Court. I know that the cases are a lot cheaper. Usually about £10,000 as opposed to £100,000s for the Royal Courts of Justice. After the bulk is done.
5 councils v Mayor of London was a High Court case in which five councils challenged the Mayor of London's decision to expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) to cover all of outer London. The councils were Hillingdon, Bexley, Bromley, and Harrow borough councils, and Surrey county council.
Here is the court paper
I do not think that the councils properly represented on behalf of the entire truth of the fact in constitutional law for the proper case, which must include the congestion charge as well.
They only made a modest use of some loose points on the constitition and not thourough. Because the Conservstive party only challenged the expansion of the current scheme.
It is questionable if their true motives were a waste of tax payer money, when the TRUE legal challenge on Magna Carta has in fact never been properly tried.
Therefore there is still a case for appeal at the Supreme Court.
So.
In brief, what are the real arguments to make, after all the evidence and true real points to argue that have not been argued at all in court since 2002 congestion charge?
They are that......
1. William the Conqueror upheld the London Liberties as his first ever law after conquest. (Those liberties include no toll charge for passage on roads) And that no other party, body, entity can be an heir or inheritor of a person. Therefore i belive there can be no inheritance tax on Londoners. Because the government cannot insert itself as an part heir.
2. London has grown. Since 1066, and there needs to be fair argument as to if more than the original city now legally includes more than just the original city area.
3. Magna Carta and the 1297 confirmation of the charters act completely protects the Ancient Liberties of London, which are still in force of law. Without doubt. And this includes no tolls in London. It should mean that people, merchants, travelers also should not have to pay to get into the city, or travel through it. Because the Kings peace route from Dover to Shrewsbury also went directly through London.
4. Kings Peace was the four main routes that were maintained freeways paid for by everyone. Nation. Not by the passer by. The road user. Therefore freeway. A1, A5, Ermine Street, Watling Street and Fosse Way and another. The four roads. They in fact make a huge cross shape on the map. Which is like the flag cross. "Kings Cross" could have coined its term from them. But in the map, though they pass through London the Fosse Way intersects Watling Street at "High Cross" south west of Coventry.
5. So... What do we know from gathering as much knowledge. Old laws as we can??
Firstly, in 1663 following the restoration of the crown and anger against Oliver Cromwells protectorate... A Toll was put on The Great Northern Road (A1) around the area that Cromwell is known to be from. This was clearly unlawful and against the Kings Peace. As it was on one of the Four Great Roads. This was the first suspected violation..
6. Through the 1600s and 1700s Tolls were put in several places around, but not within London, due to the more well known and enforced Ancient Liberties of London. The Remains of those tolls can still be seen to be well outside the City.
7. One of the Liberties of Citizens of London, is that that do not hsve to pay Tolls around the rest of the country. It is one of their Privileges, besides certain legal privileges of the courts (there is some question if this privileged them to be protected to go out and seek treasures from around the nation including thise protected by wealreaf law (tombs of ancestors) but that is another story.(Encouraging)
For certain Londoners (they didnt have a passport or driving licence) to prove where they were from. But they could obtain a cerrificate from the Mayor of London. (A writ of privilege) That exempted them from Tolls around the country.
This still should be possible now. In law. As a privilege. Therefore it is questionable if the new Blackwall Tunnel charge is exempt for London residents and the Dartford Tunnel and Crossing, Humber Bridge. Severn Bridge and M6 Toll.
8. The M6 Toll opened to traffic in December 2003. Construction began in September 2000. This road is a relief road for the A5 Cannock. Taking priority of that route and clearly is on the Kings Peace. The M6 Toll therefore is highly questionable as "illegal"
And the timing for its construction 2000 - 2003 is perfectly timed with Ken Livingstone and Tony Blair (Labour) their plan for the London Congestion charge.
9. So this is where we raise the question to bring to the Supreme Court by appeal. Are the London congestion charge and therefore ULEZ as well.. illegal??? Are these charges for usage of the road and passage on the road, unlawfull? Against the Liberty of London? And freedom of entry to London?
10. As i have collected a great volume of good evidence and information to start and build the true case. It is now clear... That
There were some minor offences or misdemeanor in London. As anywhere. Such as Furious riding.
Or dumping harmfull waste in the streets (like out of date food, meats, and wastes) and there was also at one point a fine for too many carts in the street.
The question is..... Was there a right for the government to seek to find a way to work around the oldest law in the country from before the conquest, and affirmed by William the Conqueror... And try to use some of these small misdemeanors as "ideas" which the government could use to extrapolate into What is no doubt blanket charges and a generall toll to all vehicles. That amounts to way beyond "Outrageous tolls"
Have they been able to cheat the oldest liberty of England?
Is road tax meant to already have paid for a right to use of and passage on all roads in the UK?
Should Road users in London even have to pay road tax? If the rest of the city pay for upkeep?
Should persons with a "normal car" that they bought in good will...
Be suddenly declared as toxic?
When the old London Law for foul air and spoil....was only due to the dumping of gross or waste materials. Can that basis be extrapolated to charge everyone for using their "normal vehicles" that work as intended and sold and taxed at sale??
It seem a far fantasy to say the air is foul. When also the current London Mayors scheme Ulez has not changed air quality much.
11. Congestion. It says that there was a fine for too many cars being in the road. Was that fine even lawful? There were certain regulations for design of carts and cargo. But we have regulstions on manufacture now.
Can a fine just for too many carts blocking a street, justify a whole enterprise to permanently charge all persons entering or leaving the city? Regardless of actually how busy it is at any given place or time? And whereby there is no restriction on who has a right to own a vehicle in London?
And the resulting effect is worse than having tolls in place. Or any charges for passage or usage??
What is the resulting effect????
Do people have to pay to enter london now? And pass through it? Yes or no? And is this an outrageous manifestation of charges?
In the dictionary Samuel Webster and terms used. Toll is the same as charge. Money is taken.
So there is no dispute in what the definition of toll is. Money is taken for usage. However.
It is in my opinion clearly evident that what has actually been created is "extraordinary charges" for the passage into and through London.
And that is what the Ancient Liberties of London are supposed to prevent.
No matter WHAT the NAME or claimed purpose being "pollition charge" or "congestion"
How can it be at night? When people are asleep? For example?
What about the Sabbath, Sunday? Also protected in law...when it used to be quiet? But that was changed also. Supposedly protected by the Magna Carta and Liberties of the Church.
Sunday trading laws in the UK significantly changed with the passing of the Sunday Trading Act 1994. This act limited large shops to a maximum of six hours of opening on Sundays between 10am and 6pm.
Can the claim of a NAME justify what something is CLAIMED to be there for. But in fact it serves as something else? It is just there as a charge.
It does not actually reduce air quality (proved) and is nothing like the old law that stopped people throwing out wastage into the alleys and roads creating foul odor or bacteria.
And carts blocking or being in too high frequency.. here or there...
In one place or another... Is that a reason to NAME a general blanket tax, toll, charge.. supposedly for that reason? When it transforms a spot fine into a blanket fixed toll for all drivers entering and leaving?
Was the original fine even lawful?
These are the real questions and arguments to hear and debate in the Supreme Court.
Thank You
Richard Kelly
😏 Confirmed ?
2025-02-02 02:59:35.jpeg)
Richard Kelly
Some offences
2025-02-02 02:54:45So there were some offences.... Like furious riding of horses...
And excessive waggons and carts.
The question is, did that justify a right to a "congestion charge" to everyone..and the Ulez.
Being all together outrageous. And as the road upkeep is by the city. Everyone.
I dont think there was a true challenge in the courts.
Looking at the legislation i added in detail. It supports and excemption by the Magna Carta.
I can see how they have played on the busy wagons theme to come up with the idea. Rather than blaming themselmes for relentless and obsessive planning and building with no restraint or self control.
It seems if everyone was rich. Then there would be no such control of excess vehicles. Thus pointless
So seems purely money orientated. Not for upkeep.
Likely the cart and waggon traffic law was illegal and a scam itself. Every cart has to be registered after a certain date and they were not stopping people from buying them. Thats for shure.
So we have a pretty good idea about the whole thing, now
Richard Kelly
Restoration of the Crown could be connected
2025-02-02 02:48:07So 1663 Great North Road around Cambridgeshire, Huntingdon, Hertfordshire. The Justices..
Likely this was illegal against the 4 Roads, Kings Peace, if it was on the A1. Likely Parliament thought they could get away with it to those who knew little. Might be connected to the Dick Turpin legend. He worked that area, at a time.
The London liberty was a lot harder to cheat Londoners of due to the William Conqueror and Magna Carta charters that protected London specifically.
This is important evidence for corruption. But i need to find the actual location.
The Restoration of the Crown was 1660, so it looks like the King might have been getting revenge seeing as Oliver Cromwell himself was originally from that general area Huntingdon.
The Dick Turpin legend was meant to originate in the early 1700s. There might be some contribution to the legends from this association that added into it 😌
Richard Kelly